On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
>> Let's allow GCC to optimize better.
>>
>> This exposed some five unused functions, but this patch doesn't remove them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lauri Kasanen
>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:43:34 +1000
Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Alex Deucher
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
> >> Let's allow GCC to optimize better.
> >>
> >> This exposed some five unused functions, but this patch doesn't remove
>
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Alex Deucher
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
>>> Let's allow GCC to optimize better.
>>>
>>> This exposed some five unused functions, but this patch doesn't remove them.
>>
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
>>> Let's allow GCC to optimize better.
>>>
>>> This exposed some five unused functions, but this patch doesn't remove them.
>>>
>
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:43:34 +1000
Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
> >> Let's allow GCC to optimize better.
> >>
> >> This exposed some five unused functions, but this patch doesn't remove
> >>
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
>> Let's allow GCC to optimize better.
>>
>> This exposed some five unused functions, but this patch doesn't remove them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lauri Kasanen
>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
> Let's allow GCC to optimize better.
>
> This exposed some five unused functions, but this patch doesn't remove them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lauri Kasanen
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
> Let's allow GCC to optimize better.
>
> This exposed some five unused functions, but this patch doesn't remove them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lauri Kasanen
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher
___
dri-devel maili
Let's allow GCC to optimize better.
This exposed some five unused functions, but this patch doesn't remove them.
Signed-off-by: Lauri Kasanen
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_encoders.c |4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c | 12 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergree
Let's allow GCC to optimize better.
This exposed some five unused functions, but this patch doesn't remove them.
Signed-off-by: Lauri Kasanen
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_encoders.c |4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c | 12 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergree
10 matches
Mail list logo