[PATCH] drm/radeon: Fix num_banks calculation for SI

2014-05-02 Thread Christian König
Am 02.05.2014 04:20, schrieb Michel D?nzer: > On 22.04.2014 21:51, Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Michel D?nzer wrote: >>> From: Michel D?nzer >>> >>> The way the tile mode array index was calculated only makes sense for >>> the CIK specific macrotile mode array. For SI,

[PATCH] drm/radeon: Fix num_banks calculation for SI

2014-05-02 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 22.04.2014 21:51, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Michel D?nzer wrote: >> From: Michel D?nzer >> >> The way the tile mode array index was calculated only makes sense for >> the CIK specific macrotile mode array. For SI, we need to use one of the >> tile mode array indice

[PATCH] drm/radeon: Fix num_banks calculation for SI

2014-04-22 Thread Michel Dänzer
From: Michel D?nzer The way the tile mode array index was calculated only makes sense for the CIK specific macrotile mode array. For SI, we need to use one of the tile mode array indices reserved for displayable surfaces. This happened to result in correct display most if not all of the time bec

[PATCH] drm/radeon: Fix num_banks calculation for SI

2014-04-22 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Michel D?nzer wrote: > From: Michel D?nzer > > The way the tile mode array index was calculated only makes sense for > the CIK specific macrotile mode array. For SI, we need to use one of the > tile mode array indices reserved for displayable surfaces. > > This ha