On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 10:43 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> This one looks highly suspicious, i need to check, but i would think
> that this function should be use !
Have a look at commit 76a0df859def ("drm/radeon: rework ring function
handling"), which removed the two users of rv515_ring_start.
I
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> This one looks highly suspicious, i need to check, but i would think
> that this function should be use !
Yeah, I think the attached patch is probably correct. Although r5xx
has been using the r300 ring start function for a while apparentl
This one looks highly suspicious, i need to check, but i would think
that this function should be use !
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Rickard Strandqvist
> wrote:
>> Remove the function rv515_ring_start() that is not used anywhere.
>>
>>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Rickard Strandqvist
wrote:
> Remove the function rv515_ring_start() that is not used anywhere.
>
> This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called
> cppcheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
Applied. thanks!
Alex
> ---
> driver
Remove the function rv515_ring_start() that is not used anywhere.
This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called
cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.h |1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/rv515.c | 68
