Applied. Thanks!
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:28 AM Nikita Zhandarovich
wrote:
>
> While improbable, there may be a chance of hitting integer
> overflow when the result of radeon_get_ib_value() gets shifted
> left.
>
> Avoid it by casting one of the operands to larger data type (u64).
>
> Found by
Am 29.11.23 um 17:03 schrieb Alex Deucher:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:47 AM Christian König
wrote:
Am 29.11.23 um 16:22 schrieb Nikita Zhandarovich:
While improbable, there may be a chance of hitting integer
overflow when the result of radeon_get_ib_value() gets shifted
left.
Avoid it by cast
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:47 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 29.11.23 um 16:22 schrieb Nikita Zhandarovich:
> > While improbable, there may be a chance of hitting integer
> > overflow when the result of radeon_get_ib_value() gets shifted
> > left.
> >
> > Avoid it by casting one of the operands
Am 29.11.23 um 16:22 schrieb Nikita Zhandarovich:
While improbable, there may be a chance of hitting integer
overflow when the result of radeon_get_ib_value() gets shifted
left.
Avoid it by casting one of the operands to larger data type (u64).
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.o
While improbable, there may be a chance of hitting integer
overflow when the result of radeon_get_ib_value() gets shifted
left.
Avoid it by casting one of the operands to larger data type (u64).
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with static
analysis tool SVACE.
Fixes: 1729dd3
