From: Marek Ol??k
v2: agd5f: add strmout CS checking, copy_dw register checking
v3: agd5f: don't use cs_check_reg() for copy_dw checking as it
will incorrectly patch the command stream for certain regs.
v4: agd5f: add warning if safe reg check fails for copy_dw
v5: agd5f: add stricter checking
From: Marek Ol??k
v2: agd5f: add strmout CS checking, copy_dw register checking
v3: agd5f: don't use cs_check_reg() for copy_dw checking as it
will incorrectly patch the command stream for certain regs.
v4: agd5f: add warning if safe reg check fails for copy_dw
v5: agd5f: add stricter checking
From: Marek Olšák
v2: agd5f: add strmout CS checking, copy_dw register checking
v3: agd5f: don't use cs_check_reg() for copy_dw checking as it
will incorrectly patch the command stream for certain regs.
v4: agd5f: add warning if safe reg check fails for copy_dw
v5: agd5f: add stricter checking
From: Marek Olšák
v2: agd5f: add strmout CS checking, copy_dw register checking
v3: agd5f: don't use cs_check_reg() for copy_dw checking as it
will incorrectly patch the command stream for certain regs.
v4: agd5f: add warning if safe reg check fails for copy_dw
v5: agd5f: add stricter checking
Sorry Jerome, I didn't have time to properly finish the patch and
update the CS checker properly.
Also evergreen_cs_track_check has been a no-op for a long time and
this patch doesn't make it any more exploitable.
Marek
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 20
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:17:18PM -0500, alexdeucher at gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Marek Ol??k
>>
>> v2: agd5f: add strmout CS checking, copy_dw register checking
>>
>> v3: agd5f: don't use cs_check_reg() for copy_dw checking as it
>> will i
From: Marek Ol??k
v2: agd5f: add strmout CS checking, copy_dw register checking
v3: agd5f: don't use cs_check_reg() for copy_dw checking as it
will incorrectly patch the command stream for certain regs.
v4: agd5f: add warning if safe reg check fails for copy_dw
v5: agd5f: add stricter checking
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:17:18PM -0500, alexdeucher at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Marek Ol??k
>
> v2: agd5f: add strmout CS checking, copy_dw register checking
>
> v3: agd5f: don't use cs_check_reg() for copy_dw checking as it
> will incorrectly patch the command stream for certain regs.
>
> v4
From: Marek Ol??k
v2: agd5f: add strmout CS checking, copy_dw register checking
v3: agd5f: don't use cs_check_reg() for copy_dw checking as it
will incorrectly patch the command stream for certain regs.
v4: agd5f: add warning if safe reg check fails for copy_dw
Signed-off-by: Marek Ol??k
Sign
From: Marek Ol??k
v2: agd5f: add strmout CS checking, copy_dw register checking
v3: agd5f: don't use cs_check_reg() for copy_dw checking as it
will incorrectly patch the command stream for certain regs.
Signed-off-by: Marek Ol??k
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergre
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:17:18PM -0500, alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Marek Olšák
>>
>> v2: agd5f: add strmout CS checking, copy_dw register checking
>>
>> v3: agd5f: don't use cs_check_reg() for copy_dw checking as it
>> will inco
From: Marek Olšák
v2: agd5f: add strmout CS checking, copy_dw register checking
v3: agd5f: don't use cs_check_reg() for copy_dw checking as it
will incorrectly patch the command stream for certain regs.
v4: agd5f: add warning if safe reg check fails for copy_dw
v5: agd5f: add stricter checking
Sorry Jerome, I didn't have time to properly finish the patch and
update the CS checker properly.
Also evergreen_cs_track_check has been a no-op for a long time and
this patch doesn't make it any more exploitable.
Marek
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 20
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:17:18PM -0500, alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Marek Olšák
>
> v2: agd5f: add strmout CS checking, copy_dw register checking
>
> v3: agd5f: don't use cs_check_reg() for copy_dw checking as it
> will incorrectly patch the command stream for certain regs.
>
> v4: a
From: Marek Olšák
v2: agd5f: add strmout CS checking, copy_dw register checking
v3: agd5f: don't use cs_check_reg() for copy_dw checking as it
will incorrectly patch the command stream for certain regs.
v4: agd5f: add warning if safe reg check fails for copy_dw
Signed-off-by: Marek Olšák
Sign
From: Marek Olšák
v2: agd5f: add strmout CS checking, copy_dw register checking
v3: agd5f: don't use cs_check_reg() for copy_dw checking as it
will incorrectly patch the command stream for certain regs.
Signed-off-by: Marek Olšák
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergre
From: Marek Ol??k
v2: agd5f: add strmout CS checking, copy_dw register checking
Signed-off-by: Marek Ol??k
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c | 114 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreend.h |9 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/
From: Marek Olšák
v2: agd5f: add strmout CS checking, copy_dw register checking
Signed-off-by: Marek Olšák
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c | 114 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreend.h |9 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/
You're both right. I wanted to put this patch out so that somebody
else could try this stuff out. I'll finish it when time allows.
Marek
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:21:31PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Marek O
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:21:31PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
> > People can start using transform feedback on r6xx with this.
> >
> > Strict CS checking will be implemented later.
We really need to have checking in the same patch, otherwise so
You're both right. I wanted to put this patch out so that somebody
else could try this stuff out. I'll finish it when time allows.
Marek
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:21:31PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Marek O
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:21:31PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> > People can start using transform feedback on r6xx with this.
> >
> > Strict CS checking will be implemented later.
We really need to have checking in the same patch, otherwise so
People can start using transform feedback on r6xx with this.
Strict CS checking will be implemented later.
Signed-off-by: Marek Ol??k
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c | 104 +++--
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreend.h | 10 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
> People can start using transform feedback on r6xx with this.
>
> Strict CS checking will be implemented later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Ol??k
> ---
> ?drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c ? ? | ?104
> +++--
> ?drivers/
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> People can start using transform feedback on r6xx with this.
>
> Strict CS checking will be implemented later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Olšák
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c | 104
> +++--
> drivers/
People can start using transform feedback on r6xx with this.
Strict CS checking will be implemented later.
Signed-off-by: Marek Olšák
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c | 104 +++--
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreend.h | 10 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/
26 matches
Mail list logo
