[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: add ioport register access

2010-07-17 Thread Dave Airlie
2010/7/17 Rafa? Mi?ecki : > Dave, last time you decided to push this fix for 2.6.35, then > resigned. After additional fix from Alex I can see this in drm-next > only, not in drm-fixes or Linus's tree. Did you change your mind to > postpone it until next merge window, or just forgot about this in >

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: add ioport register access

2010-07-17 Thread Rafał Miłecki
W dniu 17 lipca 2010 11:27 u?ytkownik Dave Airlie napisa?: > 2010/7/17 Rafa? Mi?ecki : >> Dave, last time you decided to push this fix for 2.6.35, then >> resigned. After additional fix from Alex I can see this in drm-next >> only, not in drm-fixes or Linus's tree. Did you change your mind to >>

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: add ioport register access

2010-07-17 Thread Rafał Miłecki
Dave, last time you decided to push this fix for 2.6.35, then resigned. After additional fix from Alex I can see this in drm-next only, not in drm-fixes or Linus's tree. Did you change your mind to postpone it until next merge window, or just forgot about this in drm-fixes? -- Rafa?

Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: add ioport register access

2010-07-17 Thread Rafał Miłecki
W dniu 17 lipca 2010 11:27 użytkownik Dave Airlie napisał: > 2010/7/17 Rafał Miłecki : >> Dave, last time you decided to push this fix for 2.6.35, then >> resigned. After additional fix from Alex I can see this in drm-next >> only, not in drm-fixes or Linus's tree. Did you change your mind to >> p

Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: add ioport register access

2010-07-17 Thread Dave Airlie
2010/7/17 Rafał Miłecki : > Dave, last time you decided to push this fix for 2.6.35, then > resigned. After additional fix from Alex I can see this in drm-next > only, not in drm-fixes or Linus's tree. Did you change your mind to > postpone it until next merge window, or just forgot about this in >

Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: add ioport register access

2010-07-17 Thread Rafał Miłecki
Dave, last time you decided to push this fix for 2.6.35, then resigned. After additional fix from Alex I can see this in drm-next only, not in drm-fixes or Linus's tree. Did you change your mind to postpone it until next merge window, or just forgot about this in drm-fixes? -- Rafał _

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: add ioport register access

2010-07-07 Thread Dave Airlie
> ?int radeon_atombios_init(struct radeon_device *rdev) > ?{ > ? ? ? ?struct card_info *atom_card_info = > @@ -427,6 +443,9 @@ int radeon_atombios_init(struct radeon_device *rdev) > ? ? ? ?atom_card_info->dev = rdev->ddev; > ? ? ? ?atom_card_info->reg_read = cail_reg_read; > ? ? ? ?atom_card_info->

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: add ioport register access

2010-07-07 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> ?int radeon_atombios_init(struct radeon_device *rdev) >> ?{ >> ? ? ? ?struct card_info *atom_card_info = >> @@ -427,6 +443,9 @@ int radeon_atombios_init(struct radeon_device *rdev) >> ? ? ? ?atom_card_info->dev = rdev->ddev; >> ? ? ? ?atom_car

Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: add ioport register access

2010-07-06 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>  int radeon_atombios_init(struct radeon_device *rdev) >>  { >>        struct card_info *atom_card_info = >> @@ -427,6 +443,9 @@ int radeon_atombios_init(struct radeon_device *rdev) >>        atom_card_info->dev = rdev->ddev; >>        atom_car

Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: add ioport register access

2010-07-06 Thread Dave Airlie
>  int radeon_atombios_init(struct radeon_device *rdev) >  { >        struct card_info *atom_card_info = > @@ -427,6 +443,9 @@ int radeon_atombios_init(struct radeon_device *rdev) >        atom_card_info->dev = rdev->ddev; >        atom_card_info->reg_read = cail_reg_read; >        atom_card_info->

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: add ioport register access

2010-07-04 Thread Rafał Miłecki
2010/6/30 Alex Deucher : > This is required for the NB_MISC regs on rs780/rs880 which > means HDMI/DVI/DP ports using PCIEPHY won't work without > it. It might also help with s/r (asic init) issues on other > atombios cards. > > Fixes: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28774 > and simi

Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: add ioport register access

2010-07-04 Thread Rafał Miłecki
2010/6/30 Alex Deucher : > This is required for the NB_MISC regs on rs780/rs880 which > means HDMI/DVI/DP ports using PCIEPHY won't work without > it. It might also help with s/r (asic init) issues on other > atombios cards. > > Fixes: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28774 > and simi

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: add ioport register access

2010-06-30 Thread Alex Deucher
This is required for the NB_MISC regs on rs780/rs880 which means HDMI/DVI/DP ports using PCIEPHY won't work without it. It might also help with s/r (asic init) issues on other atombios cards. Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28774 and similar issues reported by Alberto Milone.

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: add ioport register access

2010-06-30 Thread Alex Deucher
This is required for the NB_MISC regs on rs780/rs880 which means HDMI/DVI/DP ports using PCIEPHY won't work without it. It might also help with s/r (asic init) issues on other atombios cards. Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28774 and similar issues reported by Alberto Milone.