Thank you for comments,
I will update the patch and send v1.
On 01/26/2017 12:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:22:46AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
From the description of the "DMA-BUF/GEM Object references
and lifetime overview" i
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
From the description of the "DMA-BUF/GEM Object references
and lifetime overview" it is not clear when exactly
dma_buf gets destroyed and memory freed: only driver
.release function mentioned which makes confusion on the
real buffer's lifetime.
Add more description
On 01/26/2017 12:45 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:36:05AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:22:46AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
From the description of the "DMA-BUF/GEM Object references
and lifetime overview
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:36:05AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:22:46AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> > From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
> >
> > From the description of the "DMA-BUF/GEM Object references
> > and lifetime overview" it is not clear when exactly
>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:22:46AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>
> From the description of the "DMA-BUF/GEM Object references
> and lifetime overview" it is not clear when exactly
> dma_buf gets destroyed and memory freed: only driver
> .release function
