Hi Adrián,
Thanks for your patch. Liviu's already raised some concerns in the
adjacent thread, so I'll try not to repeat them here.
On 05/03/2024 16:58, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
This brings in support for Panthor's HW performance counters and querying
them from UM through a specific ioctl(). The c
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 17:02:15 +
Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 04:15:15PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 13:52:18 +
> > Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Adrián,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the patch and appologies for taking a bit longer to respond,
> > >
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 04:15:15PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 13:52:18 +
> Liviu Dudau wrote:
>
> > Hi Adrián,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch and appologies for taking a bit longer to respond,
> > I was trying to gather some internal Arm feedback before replying.
> >
>
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 13:52:18 +
Liviu Dudau wrote:
> Hi Adrián,
>
> Thanks for the patch and appologies for taking a bit longer to respond,
> I was trying to gather some internal Arm feedback before replying.
>
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 04:58:16PM +, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> > This brings
Hi Adrián,
Thanks for the patch and appologies for taking a bit longer to respond,
I was trying to gather some internal Arm feedback before replying.
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 04:58:16PM +, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> This brings in support for Panthor's HW performance counters and querying
> them
This brings in support for Panthor's HW performance counters and querying
them from UM through a specific ioctl(). The code is inspired by existing
functionality for the Panfrost driver, with some noteworthy differences:
- Sample size is now reported by the firmware rather than having to reckon
