> (Feedback for kernel patches on the same day, am I dreaming??)
That's panfrost!
> > Agreed, while the current implementation may be confusing it is at least
> > self-consistent. TBH it would probably be sufficient to save the bother
> > of allocating strings and just settle on "panfrost-{gpu,
> TBH it would probably be sufficient to save the bother of allocating
> strings and just settle on "panfrost-{gpu,job,mmu}", since upstream
> users are unlikely to ever come across a system with more than one
> Mali in it ;)
Agreed.
Wait, you said *upstream*? Are there oh no
signature
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 03:31:45PM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 13/12/2019 2:32 pm, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
> > > TBH it would probably be sufficient to save the bother of allocating
> > > strings and just settle on "panfrost-{gpu,job,mmu}", since upstream
> > > users are unlikely to ever come
Hey everyone,
Thanks for the quick comments.
(Feedback for kernel patches on the same day, am I dreaming??)
On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 13:46 +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 13/12/2019 1:18 pm, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 13/12/2019 13:39, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > > Currently, the inte
On 13/12/2019 2:32 pm, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
TBH it would probably be sufficient to save the bother of allocating
strings and just settle on "panfrost-{gpu,job,mmu}", since upstream
users are unlikely to ever come across a system with more than one
Mali in it ;)
Agreed.
Wait, you said *
On 13/12/2019 1:18 pm, Neil Armstrong wrote:
Hi,
On 13/12/2019 13:39, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
Currently, the interrupt lines requested by Panfrost
use ambiguous names, which adds some obscurity
to interrupt introspection (i.e. any tool based
on procfs' interrupts file).
In order to improve this
Hi,
On 13/12/2019 13:39, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Currently, the interrupt lines requested by Panfrost
> use ambiguous names, which adds some obscurity
> to interrupt introspection (i.e. any tool based
> on procfs' interrupts file).
>
> In order to improve this, prefix each requested
> interrupt
Currently, the interrupt lines requested by Panfrost
use ambiguous names, which adds some obscurity
to interrupt introspection (i.e. any tool based
on procfs' interrupts file).
In order to improve this, prefix each requested
interrupt with either the module name or the device
name, where possible.
