Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and sync interrupts

Il 24/11/23 11:21, Boris Brezillon ha scritto: On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 11:12:57 +0100 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: Il 24/11/23 10:17, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto: Il 23/11/23 16:40, Boris Brezillon ha scritto: On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:14:12 +0100 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:

Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and sync interrupts

On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 11:12:57 +0100 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Il 24/11/23 10:17, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto: > > Il 23/11/23 16:40, Boris Brezillon ha scritto: > >> On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:14:12 +0100 > >> AngeloGioacchino Del Regno > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Il 23/11/23 14:51

Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and sync interrupts

Il 24/11/23 10:17, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto: Il 23/11/23 16:40, Boris Brezillon ha scritto: On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:14:12 +0100 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: Il 23/11/23 14:51, Boris Brezillon ha scritto: On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:24:57 +0100 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:

Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and sync interrupts

Il 23/11/23 16:40, Boris Brezillon ha scritto: On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:14:12 +0100 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: Il 23/11/23 14:51, Boris Brezillon ha scritto: On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:24:57 +0100 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: So, while I agree that it'd be slightly more readable

Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and sync interrupts

On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:14:12 +0100 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Il 23/11/23 14:51, Boris Brezillon ha scritto: > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:24:57 +0100 > > AngeloGioacchino Del Regno > > wrote: > > > > So, while I agree that it'd be slightly more readable as a diff if those > >

Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and sync interrupts

Il 23/11/23 14:51, Boris Brezillon ha scritto: On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:24:57 +0100 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: So, while I agree that it'd be slightly more readable as a diff if those were two different commits I do have reasons against splitting. If we just need a quick fix to avo

Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and sync interrupts

On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:24:57 +0100 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > >> > >> So, while I agree that it'd be slightly more readable as a diff if those > >> were two different commits I do have reasons against splitting. > > > > If we just need a quick fix to avoid PWRTRANS interrupts from

Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and sync interrupts

Il 23/11/23 13:59, Boris Brezillon ha scritto: On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 12:15:01 +0100 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: Il 23/11/23 11:35, Boris Brezillon ha scritto: On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 10:53:20 +0100 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: Some SoCs may be equipped with a GPU containing two cor

Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and sync interrupts

On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 12:15:01 +0100 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Il 23/11/23 11:35, Boris Brezillon ha scritto: > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 10:53:20 +0100 > > AngeloGioacchino Del Regno > > wrote: > > > >> Some SoCs may be equipped with a GPU containing two core groups > >> and this is exac

Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and sync interrupts

Il 23/11/23 12:15, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto: Il 23/11/23 11:35, Boris Brezillon ha scritto: On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 10:53:20 +0100 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: Some SoCs may be equipped with a GPU containing two core groups and this is exactly the case of Samsung's Exynos 5422 f

Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and sync interrupts

Il 23/11/23 11:35, Boris Brezillon ha scritto: On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 10:53:20 +0100 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: Some SoCs may be equipped with a GPU containing two core groups and this is exactly the case of Samsung's Exynos 5422 featuring an ARM Mali-T628 MP6 GPU: the support for this GPU

Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and sync interrupts

Il 23/11/23 11:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto: On 23/11/2023 10:53, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: Some SoCs may be equipped with a GPU containing two core groups and this is exactly the case of Samsung's Exynos 5422 featuring an ARM Mali-T628 MP6 GPU: the support for this GPU in Panfrost

Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and sync interrupts

On 23/11/2023 10:53, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Some SoCs may be equipped with a GPU containing two core groups > and this is exactly the case of Samsung's Exynos 5422 featuring > an ARM Mali-T628 MP6 GPU: the support for this GPU in Panfrost > is partial, as this driver currently supports

Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and sync interrupts

On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 10:53:20 +0100 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Some SoCs may be equipped with a GPU containing two core groups > and this is exactly the case of Samsung's Exynos 5422 featuring > an ARM Mali-T628 MP6 GPU: the support for this GPU in Panfrost > is partial, as this driver cu

[PATCH] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and sync interrupts

Some SoCs may be equipped with a GPU containing two core groups and this is exactly the case of Samsung's Exynos 5422 featuring an ARM Mali-T628 MP6 GPU: the support for this GPU in Panfrost is partial, as this driver currently supports using only one core group and that's reflected on all parts of