On 07/10/2019 17:14, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On 10/7/19 6:09 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Hi Steven,
>>
>> On 07/10/2019 14:50, Steven Price wrote:
>>> Panfrost uses multiple schedulers (one for each slot, so 2 in reality),
>>> and on a timeout has to stop all the schedulers to safely perform a
>>> r
On 07/10/2019 14:50, Steven Price wrote:
> Panfrost uses multiple schedulers (one for each slot, so 2 in reality),
> and on a timeout has to stop all the schedulers to safely perform a
> reset. However more than one scheduler can trigger a timeout at the same
> time. This race condition results in
On 10/7/19 6:09 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
Hi Steven,
On 07/10/2019 14:50, Steven Price wrote:
Panfrost uses multiple schedulers (one for each slot, so 2 in reality),
and on a timeout has to stop all the schedulers to safely perform a
reset. However more than one scheduler can trigger a timeout
Hi Steven,
On 07/10/2019 14:50, Steven Price wrote:
> Panfrost uses multiple schedulers (one for each slot, so 2 in reality),
> and on a timeout has to stop all the schedulers to safely perform a
> reset. However more than one scheduler can trigger a timeout at the same
> time. This race condition
Panfrost uses multiple schedulers (one for each slot, so 2 in reality),
and on a timeout has to stop all the schedulers to safely perform a
reset. However more than one scheduler can trigger a timeout at the same
time. This race condition results in jobs being freed while they are
still in use.
Wh
