Il 15/02/22 23:32, Alyssa Rosenzweig ha scritto:
I'd do the oneliner changing it to 5 and be done with it. That being
said, we have plenty of examples of doing this both ways, so whatever
makes people happy.
Excellent, that's the patch I wrote originally :-)
Dropping this patch, unless Angelo
> I'd do the oneliner changing it to 5 and be done with it. That being
> said, we have plenty of examples of doing this both ways, so whatever
> makes people happy.
Excellent, that's the patch I wrote originally :-)
Dropping this patch, unless Angelo (or someone else) strongly objects.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 2:31 PM Alyssa Rosenzweig
wrote:
>
> MT8192 requires 5 power domains. Rather than bump MAX_PM_DOMAINS and
> waste memory on every supported Panfrost chip, instead dynamically
> allocate pm_domain_devs and pm_domain_links. This adds some flexibility;
> it seems inevitable a
On 2022-02-14 20:31, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
MT8192 requires 5 power domains. Rather than bump MAX_PM_DOMAINS and
waste memory on every supported Panfrost chip, instead dynamically
allocate pm_domain_devs and pm_domain_links. This adds some flexibility;
it seems inevitable a new MediaTek device
Il 14/02/22 21:55, Alyssa Rosenzweig ha scritto:
mali_kbase hardcodes MAX_PM_DOMAINS (=5 for the mt8192 kernel). I have
no real objection to it but Angelo did. Maybe should've marked this RFC.
Clarifying, the suggested patch was not a big objection, but I think that it
would be a nice preventiv
mali_kbase hardcodes MAX_PM_DOMAINS (=5 for the mt8192 kernel). I have
no real objection to it but Angelo did. Maybe should've marked this RFC.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 03:31:32PM -0500, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
> MT8192 requires 5 power domains. Rather than bump MAX_PM_DOMAINS and
> waste memory o
MT8192 requires 5 power domains. Rather than bump MAX_PM_DOMAINS and
waste memory on every supported Panfrost chip, instead dynamically
allocate pm_domain_devs and pm_domain_links. This adds some flexibility;
it seems inevitable a new MediaTek device will require more than 5
domains.
On non-MediaT
