On 3/7/2019 3:02 PM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 2019-03-07 13:59, Sean Paul wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:28:54PM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
When panel probe happens after DSI probe, the DSI probe
is deferred as per current design. In the probe defer path
dsi device is destroyed. This NULL ds
On 2019-05-29 13:43, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
On 3/7/2019 3:02 PM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 2019-03-07 13:59, Sean Paul wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:28:54PM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
When panel probe happens after DSI probe, the DSI probe
is deferred as per current design. In the probe defer
On 2019-03-07 13:59, Sean Paul wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:28:54PM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
When panel probe happens after DSI probe, the DSI probe
is deferred as per current design. In the probe defer path
dsi device is destroyed. This NULL dsi device could be
deferenced by the panel p
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:28:54PM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> When panel probe happens after DSI probe, the DSI probe
> is deferred as per current design. In the probe defer path
> dsi device is destroyed. This NULL dsi device could be
> deferenced by the panel probe in the mipi_dsi_attach path.
When panel probe happens after DSI probe, the DSI probe
is deferred as per current design. In the probe defer path
dsi device is destroyed. This NULL dsi device could be
deferenced by the panel probe in the mipi_dsi_attach path.
Check for NULL dsi device before accessing it.
Reported-by: Jeffrey
