Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: Bind pingpong block to intf on active ctls in cmd encoder

2022-02-18 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On 02/02/2022 12:48, Marijn Suijten wrote: On 2022-01-20 02:12:51, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: On 22/12/2021 13:55, Marijn Suijten wrote: As per the specification of DPU_CTL_ACTIVE_CFG the configuration of active blocks should be proactively specified, and the pingpong block is no different. The d

Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: Bind pingpong block to intf on active ctls in cmd encoder

2022-02-02 Thread Marijn Suijten
On 2022-01-20 02:12:51, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On 22/12/2021 13:55, Marijn Suijten wrote: > > As per the specification of DPU_CTL_ACTIVE_CFG the configuration of > > active blocks should be proactively specified, and the pingpong block is > > no different. > > > > The downstream display driver

Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: Bind pingpong block to intf on active ctls in cmd encoder

2022-01-19 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On 22/12/2021 13:55, Marijn Suijten wrote: As per the specification of DPU_CTL_ACTIVE_CFG the configuration of active blocks should be proactively specified, and the pingpong block is no different. The downstream display driver [1] confirms this by also calling bind_pingpong_blk on CTL_ACTIVE_CF

[PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: Bind pingpong block to intf on active ctls in cmd encoder

2021-12-22 Thread Marijn Suijten
As per the specification of DPU_CTL_ACTIVE_CFG the configuration of active blocks should be proactively specified, and the pingpong block is no different. The downstream display driver [1] confirms this by also calling bind_pingpong_blk on CTL_ACTIVE_CFG. Note that this else-if is always entered,