On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 14:53, Aleksandr Mishin wrote:
> On 08.04.2024 12:03, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 11:57, Aleksandr Mishin wrote:
> >>
> >> In dpu_core_irq_callback_handler() callback function pointer is compared
> >> to NULL,
> >> but then callback function is uncond
On 08.04.2024 12:03, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 11:57, Aleksandr Mishin wrote:
In dpu_core_irq_callback_handler() callback function pointer is compared to
NULL,
but then callback function is unconditionally called by this pointer.
Fix this bug by adding conditional retur
On 08.04.2024 19:51, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 4/8/2024 1:55 AM, Aleksandr Mishin wrote:
In dpu_core_irq_callback_handler() callback function pointer is
compared to NULL,
but then callback function is unconditionally called by this pointer.
Fix this bug by adding conditional return.
Found b
On 4/8/2024 1:55 AM, Aleksandr Mishin wrote:
In dpu_core_irq_callback_handler() callback function pointer is compared to
NULL,
but then callback function is unconditionally called by this pointer.
Fix this bug by adding conditional return.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org
In dpu_core_irq_callback_handler() callback function pointer is compared to
NULL,
but then callback function is unconditionally called by this pointer.
Fix this bug by adding conditional return.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: c929ac60b3ed ("drm/msm/dpu:
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 11:57, Aleksandr Mishin wrote:
>
> In dpu_core_irq_callback_handler() callback function pointer is compared to
> NULL,
> but then callback function is unconditionally called by this pointer.
> Fix this bug by adding conditional return.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center