Re: [PATCH] drm/modifiers: Enforce consistency between the cap an IN_FORMATS

2021-05-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 03:23:43PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > It's very confusing for userspace to have to deal with inconsistencies > here, and some drivers screwed this up a bit. Most just ommitted the > format list when they meant to say that only linear modifier is > allowed, but some also m

[PATCH] drm/modifiers: Enforce consistency between the cap an IN_FORMATS

2021-05-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
It's very confusing for userspace to have to deal with inconsistencies here, and some drivers screwed this up a bit. Most just ommitted the format list when they meant to say that only linear modifier is allowed, but some also meant that only implied modifiers are acceptable (because actually none

Re: [PATCH] drm/modifiers: Enforce consistency between the cap an IN_FORMATS

2021-04-15 Thread Simon Ser
Reviewed-by: Simon Ser ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [PATCH] drm/modifiers: Enforce consistency between the cap an IN_FORMATS

2021-04-14 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:08:15 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > It's very confusing for userspace to have to deal with inconsistencies > here, and some drivers screwed this up a bit. Most just ommitted the > format list when they meant to say that only linear modifier is > allowed, but some also meant

[PATCH] drm/modifiers: Enforce consistency between the cap an IN_FORMATS

2021-04-14 Thread Daniel Vetter
It's very confusing for userspace to have to deal with inconsistencies here, and some drivers screwed this up a bit. Most just ommitted the format list when they meant to say that only linear modifier is allowed, but some also meant that only implied modifiers are acceptable (because actually none