On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 07:52:37AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The current user of the coloring will adjust the end points of the node
> to leave a hole between disjoint memory types. This adjustment must be
> performed first or else the derived size will conflict with the
> adjustment and trigger
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:21:23AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:14:27AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 07:52:37AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > The current user of the coloring will adjust the end points of the node
> > > to leave a hole betwee
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 07:52:37AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The current user of the coloring will adjust the end points of the node
> to leave a hole between disjoint memory types. This adjustment must be
> performed first or else the derived size will conflict with the
> adjustment and trigger
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:14:27AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 07:52:37AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > The current user of the coloring will adjust the end points of the node
> > to leave a hole between disjoint memory types. This adjustment must be
> > performed first o
The current user of the coloring will adjust the end points of the node
to leave a hole between disjoint memory types. This adjustment must be
performed first or else the derived size will conflict with the
adjustment and trigger the BUG_ON sanity checks that the node is within
bounds.
Fixes regre
