On 2024-07-26 10:54, Qiang Yu wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 4:03 PM Dragan Simic
wrote:
On 2024-07-26 08:07, Qiang Yu wrote:
> Yeah, I agree weakdep is a better choice here. It solves the confusion
> of softdep which the depend module is optional.
Thanks, I'm glad that you agree.
> But I pre
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 4:03 PM Dragan Simic wrote:
>
> Hello Qiang Yu,
>
> On 2024-07-26 08:07, Qiang Yu wrote:
> > Yeah, I agree weakdep is a better choice here. It solves the confusion
> > of softdep which the depend module is optional.
>
> Thanks, I'm glad that you agree.
>
> > But I prefer us
Hello Qiang Yu,
On 2024-07-26 08:07, Qiang Yu wrote:
Yeah, I agree weakdep is a better choice here. It solves the confusion
of softdep which the depend module is optional.
Thanks, I'm glad that you agree.
But I prefer using weakdep directly instead of creating an aliasing of
it which has no
Yeah, I agree weakdep is a better choice here. It solves the confusion
of softdep
which the depend module is optional.
But I prefer using weakdep directly instead of creating an aliasing of
it which has
no actual difference.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 4:21 PM Dragan Simic wrote:
>
> Hello Qiang,
>
Hello Qiang,
On 2024-06-26 08:49, Dragan Simic wrote:
On 2024-06-26 03:11, Qiang Yu wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 2:15 AM Dragan Simic
wrote:
Just checking, any further thoughts about this patch?
I'm OK with this as a temp workaround because it's simple and do no
harm
even it's not perfect
Applied to drm-misc-next.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 2:49 PM Dragan Simic wrote:
>
> Hello Qiang,
>
> On 2024-06-26 03:11, Qiang Yu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 2:15 AM Dragan Simic
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> Just checking, any further thoughts about this patch?
> >>
> > I
Hello Qiang,
On 2024-06-26 03:11, Qiang Yu wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 2:15 AM Dragan Simic
wrote:
Hello everyone,
Just checking, any further thoughts about this patch?
I'm OK with this as a temp workaround because it's simple and do no
harm
even it's not perfect. If no other better sug
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 2:15 AM Dragan Simic wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Just checking, any further thoughts about this patch?
>
I'm OK with this as a temp workaround because it's simple and do no harm
even it's not perfect. If no other better suggestion for short term, I'll submit
this at week
Hello everyone,
Just checking, any further thoughts about this patch?
On 2024-06-18 21:22, Dragan Simic wrote:
On 2024-06-18 12:33, Dragan Simic wrote:
On 2024-06-18 10:13, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 04:01:26PM GMT, Qiang Yu wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:33 PM Qiang Yu
On 2024-06-18 12:33, Dragan Simic wrote:
Hello Qiang and Maxime,
On 2024-06-18 10:13, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 04:01:26PM GMT, Qiang Yu wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:33 PM Qiang Yu wrote:
>
> I see the problem that initramfs need to build a module dependency chain,
> b
Hello Qiang and Maxime,
On 2024-06-18 10:13, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 04:01:26PM GMT, Qiang Yu wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:33 PM Qiang Yu wrote:
>
> I see the problem that initramfs need to build a module dependency chain,
> but lima does not call any symbol from simp
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 04:01:26PM GMT, Qiang Yu wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:33 PM Qiang Yu wrote:
> >
> > I see the problem that initramfs need to build a module dependency chain,
> > but lima does not call any symbol from simpleondemand governor module.
> >
> > softdep module seems to be
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:33 PM Qiang Yu wrote:
>
> I see the problem that initramfs need to build a module dependency chain,
> but lima does not call any symbol from simpleondemand governor module.
>
> softdep module seems to be optional while our dependency is hard one,
> can we just add MODULE
I see the problem that initramfs need to build a module dependency chain,
but lima does not call any symbol from simpleondemand governor module.
softdep module seems to be optional while our dependency is hard one,
can we just add MODULE_INFO(depends, _depends), or create a new
macro called MODULE
Lima DRM driver uses devfreq to perform DVFS, while using simple_ondemand
devfreq governor by default. This causes driver initialization to fail on
boot when simple_ondemand governor isn't built into the kernel statically,
as a result of the missing module dependency and, consequently, the require
15 matches
Mail list logo
