RE: [PATCH] drm/lcdif: Do not disable clock on already suspended hardware

2024-02-25 Thread Ying Liu
On Friday, January 19, 2024 2:39 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > In case the LCDIF is enabled in DT but unused, the clock used by the Nit: s/clock/clocks/ > LCDIF are not enabled. Those clock may even have a use count of 0 in Ditto. > case there are no other users of those clock. This can happen e.g.

Re: [PATCH] drm/lcdif: Do not disable clock on already suspended hardware

2024-02-23 Thread Marek Vasut
On 1/18/24 19:39, Marek Vasut wrote: In case the LCDIF is enabled in DT but unused, the clock used by the LCDIF are not enabled. Those clock may even have a use count of 0 in case there are no other users of those clock. This can happen e.g. in case the LCDIF drives HDMI bridge which has no panel

Re: [PATCH] drm/lcdif: Do not disable clock on already suspended hardware

2024-02-11 Thread Marek Vasut
On 1/18/24 19:39, Marek Vasut wrote: In case the LCDIF is enabled in DT but unused, the clock used by the LCDIF are not enabled. Those clock may even have a use count of 0 in case there are no other users of those clock. This can happen e.g. in case the LCDIF drives HDMI bridge which has no panel

[PATCH] drm/lcdif: Do not disable clock on already suspended hardware

2024-01-18 Thread Marek Vasut
In case the LCDIF is enabled in DT but unused, the clock used by the LCDIF are not enabled. Those clock may even have a use count of 0 in case there are no other users of those clock. This can happen e.g. in case the LCDIF drives HDMI bridge which has no panel plugged into the HDMI connector. Do n