On Tue, 11 Feb 2020, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 04:47:53PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> There is no real reason to require drivers to set and use
>> dev->dev_private. Indeed, the current recommendation, as documented in
>> drm_device.h, is to embed struct drm_device in the per-
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 04:47:53PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> There is no real reason to require drivers to set and use
> dev->dev_private. Indeed, the current recommendation, as documented in
> drm_device.h, is to embed struct drm_device in the per-device struct
> instead of using dev_private.
>
There is no real reason to require drivers to set and use
dev->dev_private. Indeed, the current recommendation, as documented in
drm_device.h, is to embed struct drm_device in the per-device struct
instead of using dev_private.
Remove the requirement for dev_private to have been set to indicate
dr
