On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 09:19:39AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 01:52:27PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Cc'ing Dan Carpenter
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 12:57:13PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Oct 2021, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2021-10-01 0
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 01:52:27PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Cc'ing Dan Carpenter
>
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 12:57:13PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Fri, 01 Oct 2021, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2021-10-01 08:40:41)
> > > > When trying to bring IS_ACTIVE to linux
Cc'ing Dan Carpenter
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 12:57:13PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 01 Oct 2021, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2021-10-01 08:40:41)
When trying to bring IS_ACTIVE to linux/kconfig.h I thought it wouldn't
provide much value just encapsulating it in a boolea
Hi Lucas,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on drm-tip/drm-tip drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next
tegra-drm/drm/tegra/for-next v5.15-rc3 next-20210823]
[cannot apply to airlied/drm-next]
[If your patch is applied
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 12:57:13PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 01 Oct 2021, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2021-10-01 08:40:41)
When trying to bring IS_ACTIVE to linux/kconfig.h I thought it wouldn't
provide much value just encapsulating it in a boolean context. So I also
a
Hi Lucas,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on drm-tip/drm-tip drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next
tegra-drm/drm/tegra/for-next v5.15-rc3 next-20210922]
[cannot apply to airlied/drm-next]
[If your patch is
Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2021-10-01 08:40:41)
> When trying to bring IS_ACTIVE to linux/kconfig.h I thought it wouldn't
> provide much value just encapsulating it in a boolean context. So I also
> added the support for handling undefined macros as the IS_ENABLED()
> counterpart. However the feedbac
On Fri, 01 Oct 2021, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2021-10-01 08:40:41)
>> When trying to bring IS_ACTIVE to linux/kconfig.h I thought it wouldn't
>> provide much value just encapsulating it in a boolean context. So I also
>> added the support for handling undefined macros as the
On Fri, 01 Oct 2021, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> When trying to bring IS_ACTIVE to linux/kconfig.h I thought it wouldn't
> provide much value just encapsulating it in a boolean context. So I also
> added the support for handling undefined macros as the IS_ENABLED()
> counterpart. However the feedback
When trying to bring IS_ACTIVE to linux/kconfig.h I thought it wouldn't
provide much value just encapsulating it in a boolean context. So I also
added the support for handling undefined macros as the IS_ENABLED()
counterpart. However the feedback received from Masahiro Yamada was that
it is too ugl
10 matches
Mail list logo
