hanks,
> Ben Mesman.
>
> > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > Van: Ben Mesman [mailto:ben at bnc.nl]
> > Verzonden: dinsdag 16 april 2013 20:00
> > Aan: Daniel Vetter
> > CC: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; Ben Mesman (Bossers & Cnossen BV)
> > Onderwerp: [
Mesman (Bossers & Cnossen BV)
> Onderwerp: [PATCH] drm/i915: no lvds quirk for hp t5740
>
> Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-May/023245.html).
> This device reports an lvds panel, but does
hanks,
> Ben Mesman.
>
> > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > Van: Ben Mesman [mailto:b...@bnc.nl]
> > Verzonden: dinsdag 16 april 2013 20:00
> > Aan: Daniel Vetter
> > CC: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Ben Mesman (Bossers & Cnossen BV)
> > Onderwerp: [PATCH]
ssers & Cnossen BV)
> Onderwerp: [PATCH] drm/i915: no lvds quirk for hp t5740
>
> Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-May/023245.html).
> This device reports an lvds panel, but does not r
Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-May/023245.html).
This device reports an lvds panel, but does not really have one.
The predecessor of this device is the "hp t5740", which also does not have
an lvds panel. This pa
Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-May/023245.html).
This device reports an lvds panel, but does not really have one.
The predecessor of this device is the "hp t5740", which also does not have
an lvds panel. This pa
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: 'Chris Wilson' [mailto:chris at chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Verzonden: maandag 15 april 2013 11:59
> Aan: Ben Mesman (Bossers & Cnossen BV)
> CC: Daniel Vetter; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [PATCH] drm/
mp; Cnossen BV)
> > CC: Daniel Vetter; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Onderwerp: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: no lvds quirk for hp t5740
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 06:39:15AM +, Ben Mesman (Bossers &
> > Cnossen BV) wrote:
> > > Op vrijdag 12 april 2
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 06:39:15AM +, Ben Mesman (Bossers & Cnossen BV)
wrote:
> Op vrijdag 12 april 2013 14:47 schreef Chris Wilson:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 02:24:43PM +0200, Ben Mesman wrote:
> > > Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see
> > > http://lists.freede
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: 'Chris Wilson' [mailto:chris at chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Verzonden: maandag 15 april 2013 11:39
> Aan: Ben Mesman (Bossers & Cnossen BV)
> CC: Daniel Vetter; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [PATCH] drm/
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: 'Chris Wilson' [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Verzonden: maandag 15 april 2013 11:59
> Aan: Ben Mesman (Bossers & Cnossen BV)
> CC: Daniel Vetter; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: no
Op vrijdag 12 april 2013 14:47 schreef Chris Wilson:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 02:24:43PM +0200, Ben Mesman wrote:
> > Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-May/023245.html).
> > This device reports an lvds panel, b
ossen BV)
> > CC: Daniel Vetter; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Onderwerp: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: no lvds quirk for hp t5740
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 06:39:15AM +, Ben Mesman (Bossers &
> > Cnossen BV) wrote:
> > > Op vrijdag 12 april 2
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: 'Chris Wilson' [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Verzonden: maandag 15 april 2013 11:39
> Aan: Ben Mesman (Bossers & Cnossen BV)
> CC: Daniel Vetter; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: no
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 06:39:15AM +, Ben Mesman (Bossers & Cnossen BV)
wrote:
> Op vrijdag 12 april 2013 14:47 schreef Chris Wilson:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 02:24:43PM +0200, Ben Mesman wrote:
> > > Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see
> > > http://lists.freede
Op vrijdag 12 april 2013 14:47 schreef Chris Wilson:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 02:24:43PM +0200, Ben Mesman wrote:
> > Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-May/023245.html).
> > This device reports an lvds panel, b
Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-May/023245.html).
This device reports an lvds panel, but does not really have one.
The predecessor of this device is the "hp t5740", which also does not have
an lvds panel. This pa
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 02:24:43PM +0200, Ben Mesman wrote:
> Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-May/023245.html).
> This device reports an lvds panel, but does not really have one.
>
> The predecessor of this dev
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Ben Mesman (Bossers & Cnossen BV)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-May/023245.html). This
> device reports an lvds panel, but does not really have one.
>
> The
Hi,
Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-May/023245.html). This
device reports an lvds panel, but does not really have one.
The predecessor of this device is the "hp t5740", which also does not have an
lvds panel.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 02:24:43PM +0200, Ben Mesman wrote:
> Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-May/023245.html).
> This device reports an lvds panel, but does not really have one.
>
> The predecessor of this dev
Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-May/023245.html).
This device reports an lvds panel, but does not really have one.
The predecessor of this device is the "hp t5740", which also does not have
an lvds panel. This pa
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Ben Mesman (Bossers & Cnossen BV)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-May/023245.html). This
> device reports an lvds panel, but does not really have one.
>
> The
Hi,
Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-May/023245.html). This
device reports an lvds panel, but does not really have one.
The predecessor of this device is the "hp t5740", which also does not have an
lvds panel.
24 matches
Mail list logo