RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Perform execbuffer object locking as a separate step

2021-06-17 Thread Tang, CQ
i915: Perform execbuffer object locking as a > separate step > > To help avoid evicting already resident buffers from the batch we're > processing, perform locking as a separate step. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström > --- > .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Perform execbuffer object locking as a separate step

2021-06-17 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 15-06-2021 om 13:36 schreef Thomas Hellström: > To help avoid evicting already resident buffers from the batch we're > processing, perform locking as a separate step. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström > --- > .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c| 25 --- > 1 file ch

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Perform execbuffer object locking as a separate step

2021-06-17 Thread Thomas Hellström
On 6/17/21 11:56 AM, Ramalingam C wrote: On 2021-06-15 at 13:36:00 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote: To help avoid evicting already resident buffers from the batch we're processing, perform locking as a separate step. Looks reasonable to me. Reviewed-by: Ramalingam C Thanks for reviewing!

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Perform execbuffer object locking as a separate step

2021-06-17 Thread Ramalingam C
On 2021-06-15 at 13:36:00 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote: > To help avoid evicting already resident buffers from the batch we're > processing, perform locking as a separate step. > Looks reasonable to me. Reviewed-by: Ramalingam C > Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström > --- > .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/

[PATCH] drm/i915: Perform execbuffer object locking as a separate step

2021-06-15 Thread Thomas Hellström
To help avoid evicting already resident buffers from the batch we're processing, perform locking as a separate step. Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström --- .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c| 25 --- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/