[PATCH] drm/i915: Handle the no-interrupts case for UMS by polling

2011-02-10 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:58:12 +, Chris Clayton wrote: > OK, I haven't raised the bug report yet, but I now know how to create it - > reboot via kexec which is what I must have done when I built and installed > the > kernel to test your patches. I guess not having booted via the bios is > l

[PATCH] drm/i915: Handle the no-interrupts case for UMS by polling

2011-02-10 Thread Chris Clayton
Hi Chris, On Sunday 23 January 2011, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:38:41 +, Chris Clayton googlemail.com> wrote: > > I guess we may be working with slightly different versions of the source. > > > > 2. The kernel log now contains the following: > > > > r8169 :02:00.0: e

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Handle the no-interrupts case for UMS by polling

2011-02-10 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:58:12 +, Chris Clayton wrote: > OK, I haven't raised the bug report yet, but I now know how to create it - > reboot via kexec which is what I must have done when I built and installed > the > kernel to test your patches. I guess not having booted via the bios is > l

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Handle the no-interrupts case for UMS by polling

2011-02-10 Thread Chris Clayton
Hi Chris, On Sunday 23 January 2011, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:38:41 +, Chris Clayton wrote: > > I guess we may be working with slightly different versions of the source. > > > > 2. The kernel log now contains the following: > > > > r8169 :02:00.0: eth0: link up > >

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Handle the no-interrupts case for UMS by polling

2011-01-24 Thread Chris Clayton
On Sunday 23 January 2011, Chris Wilson wrote: > If the driver calls into the kernel to wait for a breadcrumb to pass, > but hasn't enabled interrupts, fallback to polling the breadcrumb value. > > Reported-by: Chris Clayton > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c |

[PATCH] drm/i915: Handle the no-interrupts case for UMS by polling

2011-01-23 Thread Chris Wilson
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:38:41 +, Chris Clayton wrote: > That's done it. With all three patches applied, X and KDE are starting now. > Thanks for your work on this. That's good to hear! > A couple of points though. > > 1. The latest patch applied but the following warning was spat out: > >

[PATCH] drm/i915: Handle the no-interrupts case for UMS by polling

2011-01-23 Thread Chris Clayton
On Sunday 23 January 2011, Chris Wilson wrote: > If the driver calls into the kernel to wait for a breadcrumb to pass, > but hasn't enabled interrupts, fallback to polling the breadcrumb value. > > Reported-by: Chris Clayton > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c |

[PATCH] drm/i915: Handle the no-interrupts case for UMS by polling

2011-01-23 Thread Chris Wilson
If the driver calls into the kernel to wait for a breadcrumb to pass, but hasn't enabled interrupts, fallback to polling the breadcrumb value. Reported-by: Chris Clayton Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Handle the no-interrupts case for UMS by polling

2011-01-23 Thread Chris Wilson
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:38:41 +, Chris Clayton wrote: > That's done it. With all three patches applied, X and KDE are starting now. > Thanks for your work on this. That's good to hear! > A couple of points though. > > 1. The latest patch applied but the following warning was spat out: > >

[PATCH] drm/i915: Handle the no-interrupts case for UMS by polling

2011-01-23 Thread Chris Wilson
If the driver calls into the kernel to wait for a breadcrumb to pass, but hasn't enabled interrupts, fallback to polling the breadcrumb value. Reported-by: Chris Clayton Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)