On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Nikita Zhandarovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/25/24 01:17, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Jul 2024, Nikita Zhandarovich wrote:
>>> On the off chance that clock value ends up being too high (by means
>>> of skl_ddi_calculate_wrpll() having benn called with big enough
>>> value o
Hi,
On 7/25/24 01:17, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2024, Nikita Zhandarovich wrote:
>> On the off chance that clock value ends up being too high (by means
>> of skl_ddi_calculate_wrpll() having benn called with big enough
>> value of crtc_state->port_clock * 1000), one possible consequence
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024, Nikita Zhandarovich wrote:
> On the off chance that clock value ends up being too high (by means
> of skl_ddi_calculate_wrpll() having benn called with big enough
> value of crtc_state->port_clock * 1000), one possible consequence
> may be that the result will not be able to f
On the off chance that clock value ends up being too high (by means
of skl_ddi_calculate_wrpll() having benn called with big enough
value of crtc_state->port_clock * 1000), one possible consequence
may be that the result will not be able to fit into signed int.
Fix this, albeit unlikely, issue by
