On Sun, 5 Aug 2012, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:31:15PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > If the allocation of 'buf' succeeds but the allocation of 'msgs' fails
> > we'll return false and leak 'buf' when it goes out of scope.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
>
> I've already
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:31:15PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> If the allocation of 'buf' succeeds but the allocation of 'msgs' fails
> we'll return false and leak 'buf' when it goes out of scope.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
I've already merged a similar patch from Alan Cox for -fixes, should
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:31:15PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > If the allocation of 'buf' succeeds but the allocation of 'msgs' fails
> > we'll return false and leak 'buf' when it goes out of scope.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
>
> I've already
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:31:15PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> If the allocation of 'buf' succeeds but the allocation of 'msgs' fails
> we'll return false and leak 'buf' when it goes out of scope.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
I've already merged a similar patch from Alan Cox for -fixes, should
If the allocation of 'buf' succeeds but the allocation of 'msgs' fails
we'll return false and leak 'buf' when it goes out of scope.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 11 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
note: compile tested only due t
If the allocation of 'buf' succeeds but the allocation of 'msgs' fails
we'll return false and leak 'buf' when it goes out of scope.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 11 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
note: compile tested only due t