On Fri, 17 Jan 2020, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Jani,
>
>> >> Reported-by: Hulk Robot
>> >
>> > I've never been a fan of non human accounts, we had this discussion
>> > already in a different mailing list. Could you please find a
>> > different way of giving credit to your CI system?
>>
>> I don't a
Hi Jani,
> >> Reported-by: Hulk Robot
> >
> > I've never been a fan of non human accounts, we had this discussion
> > already in a different mailing list. Could you please find a
> > different way of giving credit to your CI system?
>
> I don't actually mind for Reported-by credits. The history
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Zhang,
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 03:34:36PM +0800, Zhang Xiaoxu wrote:
>> Since commit 742379c0c4001 ("drm/i915: Start chopping up the GPU error
>> capture"), function 'i915_error_state_store' was defined and used with
>> only one parameter.
>>
>> But
Hi Zhang,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 03:34:36PM +0800, Zhang Xiaoxu wrote:
> Since commit 742379c0c4001 ("drm/i915: Start chopping up the GPU error
> capture"), function 'i915_error_state_store' was defined and used with
> only one parameter.
>
> But if no 'CONFIG_DRM_I915_CAPTURE_ERROR', this funct
Since commit 742379c0c4001 ("drm/i915: Start chopping up the GPU error
capture"), function 'i915_error_state_store' was defined and used with
only one parameter.
But if no 'CONFIG_DRM_I915_CAPTURE_ERROR', this function was defined
with two parameter.
This may lead compile error. This patch fix it
