On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 02:29:22AM +0800, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 05:09:34PM +0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
>> Add checks for the return value of alloc_workqueue and
>> alloc_ordered_workqueue as they may return NULL pointer and cause NULL
>> pointer dereference.
>> Moreover, de
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 05:09:34PM +0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> Add checks for the return value of alloc_workqueue and
> alloc_ordered_workqueue as they may return NULL pointer and cause NULL
> pointer dereference.
> Moreover, destroy them when fails later in order to avoid memory leak.
> Because
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 05:09:34PM +0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> Add checks for the return value of alloc_workqueue and
> alloc_ordered_workqueue as they may return NULL pointer and cause NULL
> pointer dereference.
> Moreover, destroy them when fails later in order to avoid memory leak.
> Because
Add checks for the return value of alloc_workqueue and
alloc_ordered_workqueue as they may return NULL pointer and cause NULL
pointer dereference.
Moreover, destroy them when fails later in order to avoid memory leak.
Because in `drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c`, if
intel_modeset_init_noirq fail
