On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 02:14:42 -0700, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
Hi Tvrtko,
> On 27/03/2023 18:47, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> >
> > +Daniel
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 09:58:52AM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> >> On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 04:52:59 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi Rodrigo,
> >>
On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 10:47:25 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>
Hi Rodrigo,
Sorry for the delay, I got pulled away into a couple of other things and
could only now get back to this.
>
> +Daniel
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 09:58:52AM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 04:52:59 -0700,
On 27/03/2023 18:47, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
+Daniel
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 09:58:52AM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 04:52:59 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
Hi Rodrigo,
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 04:31:22PM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 11:15:02 -0700, Be
+Daniel
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 09:58:52AM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 04:52:59 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> >
>
> Hi Rodrigo,
>
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 04:31:22PM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 11:15:02 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
> > >
On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 04:52:59 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>
Hi Rodrigo,
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 04:31:22PM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 11:15:02 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Hi Vinay,
> >
> > Thanks for the review. Comments inline below.
> >
> > > On 3/15
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 17:06:33 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
>
Hi Vinay,
> On 3/24/2023 4:31 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 11:15:02 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
> > Hi Vinay,
> >
> > Thanks for the review. Comments inline below.
> Sorry about asking the same questions all
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 04:31:22PM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 11:15:02 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
> >
>
> Hi Vinay,
>
> Thanks for the review. Comments inline below.
>
> > On 3/15/2023 8:59 PM, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
> > > On dGfx, the PL1 power limit being enabled a
On 3/24/2023 4:31 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 11:15:02 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
Hi Vinay,
Thanks for the review. Comments inline below.
Sorry about asking the same questions all over again :) Didn't look at
previous versions.
On 3/15/2023 8:59 PM, Ashutosh Dixit w
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 11:15:02 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
>
Hi Vinay,
Thanks for the review. Comments inline below.
> On 3/15/2023 8:59 PM, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
> > On dGfx, the PL1 power limit being enabled and set to a low value results
> > in a low GPU operating freq. It also negates the
On 3/15/2023 8:59 PM, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
On dGfx, the PL1 power limit being enabled and set to a low value results
in a low GPU operating freq. It also negates the freq raise operation which
is done before GuC firmware load. As a result GuC firmware load can time
out. Such timeouts were seen
On dGfx, the PL1 power limit being enabled and set to a low value results
in a low GPU operating freq. It also negates the freq raise operation which
is done before GuC firmware load. As a result GuC firmware load can time
out. Such timeouts were seen in the GL #8062 bug below (where the PL1 power
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:33:58 -0800, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
>
> On dGfx, the PL1 power limit being enabled and set to a low value results
> in a low GPU operating freq. It also negates the freq raise operation which
> is done before GuC firmware load. As a result GuC firmware load can time
> out. Suc
On dGfx, the PL1 power limit being enabled and set to a low value results
in a low GPU operating freq. It also negates the freq raise operation which
is done before GuC firmware load. As a result GuC firmware load can time
out. Such timeouts were seen in the GL #8062 bug below (where the PL1 power
13 matches
Mail list logo
