On 16/12/2021 20:30, John Harrison wrote:
On 12/16/2021 00:47, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 15/12/2021 22:45, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
From: John Harrison
A fault injection probe test hit a BUG_ON in a GuC error path. It
showed that the GuC code could potentially attempt to do many thin
On 12/16/2021 00:47, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 15/12/2021 22:45, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
From: John Harrison
A fault injection probe test hit a BUG_ON in a GuC error path. It
showed that the GuC code could potentially attempt to do many things
when the device is actually wedged. So, ad
On 15/12/2021 22:45, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
From: John Harrison
A fault injection probe test hit a BUG_ON in a GuC error path. It
showed that the GuC code could potentially attempt to do many things
when the device is actually wedged. So, add a check in to prevent that.
Signed-off
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 02:45:56PM -0800, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison
>
> A fault injection probe test hit a BUG_ON in a GuC error path. It
> showed that the GuC code could potentially attempt to do many things
> when the device is actually wedged. So, add a check in to
From: John Harrison
A fault injection probe test hit a BUG_ON in a GuC error path. It
showed that the GuC code could potentially attempt to do many things
when the device is actually wedged. So, add a check in to prevent that.
Signed-off-by: John Harrison
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_g