On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 16:03:46 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>
> /* Actual frequency should rise above min */
> - if (max_act_freq == slpc_min_freq) {
> + if (max_act_freq <= slpc_min_freq) {
> pr_err("Actual freq did not rise above min\n")
This test will validate we can achieve actual frequency of RP0. Pcode
grants frequencies based on what GuC is requesting. However, thermal
throttling can limit what is being granted. Add a test to request for
max, but don't fail the test if RP0 is not granted due to throttle
reasons.
Also optimize
On 6/24/2022 8:59 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 16:33:20 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
+static int max_granted_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct intel_rps
*rps, u32 *max_act_freq)
+{
+ struct intel_gt *gt = rps_to_gt(rps);
+ u32 perf_limit_reasons;
+
On 6/24/2022 8:59 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 16:21:46 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
On 6/22/2022 1:32 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:47:12 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
This test will validate we can achieve actual frequency of RP0. Pcode
grants freq
On 6/24/2022 8:59 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 16:33:20 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
+static int max_granted_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct intel_rps
*rps, u32 *max_act_freq)
+{
+ struct intel_gt *gt = rps_to_gt(rps);
+ u32 perf_limit_reasons;
+
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 16:33:20 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>
> +static int max_granted_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct intel_rps
> *rps, u32 *max_act_freq)
> +{
> + struct intel_gt *gt = rps_to_gt(rps);
> + u32 perf_limit_reasons;
> + int err = 0;
>
> - ig
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 16:21:46 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
> On 6/22/2022 1:32 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:47:12 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> >> This test will validate we can achieve actual frequency of RP0. Pcode
> >> grants frequencies based on what GuC is request
This test will validate we can achieve actual frequency of RP0. Pcode
grants frequencies based on what GuC is requesting. However, thermal
throttling can limit what is being granted. Add a test to request for
max, but don't fail the test if RP0 is not granted due to throttle
reasons.
Also optimize
On 6/22/2022 1:32 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:47:12 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
This test will validate we can achieve actual frequency of RP0. Pcode
grants frequencies based on what GuC is requesting. However, thermal
throttling can limit what is being granted. Add a
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:47:12 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>
> This test will validate we can achieve actual frequency of RP0. Pcode
> grants frequencies based on what GuC is requesting. However, thermal
> throttling can limit what is being granted. Add a test to request for
> max, but don't fail
This test will validate we can achieve actual frequency of RP0. Pcode
grants frequencies based on what GuC is requesting. However, thermal
throttling can limit what is being granted. Add a test to request for
max, but don't fail the test if RP0 is not granted due to throttle
reasons.
Also optimize
This test will validate we can achieve actual frequency of RP0. Pcode
grants frequencies based on what GuC is requesting. However, thermal
throttling can limit what is being granted. Add a test to request for
max, but don't fail the test if RP0 is not granted due to throttle
reasons.
Also optimize
12 matches
Mail list logo
