On 11/07/2024 06:12, Nitin Gote wrote:
We're seeing a GPU HANG issue on a CHV platform, which was caused by
bac24f59f454 ("drm/i915/execlists: Enable coarse preemption boundaries for
gen8").
Gen8 platform has only timeslice and doesn't support a preemption mechanism
as engines do not have a p
We're seeing a GPU HANG issue on a CHV platform, which was caused by
bac24f59f454 ("drm/i915/execlists: Enable coarse preemption boundaries for
gen8").
Gen8 platform has only timeslice and doesn't support a preemption mechanism
as engines do not have a preemption timer and doesn't send an irq if
@linux.intel.com; sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Do not consider preemption during
> execlists_dequeue for gen8
>
>
> On 09/07/2024 15:02, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >
> > On 09/07/2024 13:53, Nitin Gote wrote:
> >> We're
On 09/07/2024 15:02, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 09/07/2024 13:53, Nitin Gote wrote:
We're seeing a GPU HANG issue on a CHV platform, which was caused by
bac24f59f454 ("drm/i915/execlists: Enable coarse preemption boundaries
for gen8").
Gen8 platform has only timeslice and doesn't support a p
On 09/07/2024 13:53, Nitin Gote wrote:
We're seeing a GPU HANG issue on a CHV platform, which was caused by
bac24f59f454 ("drm/i915/execlists: Enable coarse preemption boundaries for
gen8").
Gen8 platform has only timeslice and doesn't support a preemption mechanism
as engines do not have a p
We're seeing a GPU HANG issue on a CHV platform, which was caused by
bac24f59f454 ("drm/i915/execlists: Enable coarse preemption boundaries for
gen8").
Gen8 platform has only timeslice and doesn't support a preemption mechanism
as engines do not have a preemption timer and doesn't send an irq if
