On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:14:59AM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>
> On 10/17/23 09:54, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 04:27:24PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > > Dual-licence in order to make it possible for other non-GPL os'es
> > > to re-implement the code. The use of
On 10/17/23 09:54, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 04:27:24PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
Dual-licence in order to make it possible for other non-GPL os'es
to re-implement the code. The use of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() is intentionally
left untouched to prevent use of drm_gpuvm as
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 04:27:24PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Dual-licence in order to make it possible for other non-GPL os'es
> to re-implement the code. The use of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() is intentionally
> left untouched to prevent use of drm_gpuvm as a proxy for non-GPL drivers
> to access G
Dual-licence in order to make it possible for other non-GPL os'es
to re-implement the code. The use of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() is intentionally
left untouched to prevent use of drm_gpuvm as a proxy for non-GPL drivers
to access GPL-only kernel symbols.
Much of the ideas and algorithms used in the drm_
