On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:02:02AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
> > This is the 2nd attempt, I've always been a bit dissatisified with the
> > tricky nature of the first one:
> >
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-July
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> This is the 2nd attempt, I've always been a bit dissatisified with the
> tricky nature of the first one:
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-July/025451.html
>
> The issue is that the flink ioctl can race with calling ge
This is the 2nd attempt, I've always been a bit dissatisified with the
tricky nature of the first one:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-July/025451.html
The issue is that the flink ioctl can race with calling gem_close on
the last gem handle. In that case we'll end up with a z
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:02:02AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > This is the 2nd attempt, I've always been a bit dissatisified with the
> > tricky nature of the first one:
> >
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-July/02
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> This is the 2nd attempt, I've always been a bit dissatisified with the
> tricky nature of the first one:
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-July/025451.html
>
> The issue is that the flink ioctl can race with calling gem
This is the 2nd attempt, I've always been a bit dissatisified with the
tricky nature of the first one:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-July/025451.html
The issue is that the flink ioctl can race with calling gem_close on
the last gem handle. In that case we'll end up with a z
