On Jun 26, 2013 4:13 PM, "Maarten Lankhorst" <
maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Op 26-06-13 04:14, Seung-Woo Kim schreef:
> > From: YoungJun Cho
> >
> > The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex,
> > but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to m
From: YoungJun Cho
The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex,
but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to missing
callers and adds WARN_ON assertion whether drm_gem_mmap_obj() is
called with mutex lock or not.
Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho
Signed-off-by: Seu
Op 26-06-13 04:14, Seung-Woo Kim schreef:
> From: YoungJun Cho
>
> The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex,
> but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to missing
> callers and adds WARN_ON assertion whether drm_gem_mmap_obj() is
> called with mutex lock or
On Jun 26, 2013 4:13 PM, "Maarten Lankhorst" <
maarten.lankho...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Op 26-06-13 04:14, Seung-Woo Kim schreef:
> > From: YoungJun Cho
> >
> > The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex,
> > but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to miss
Op 26-06-13 04:14, Seung-Woo Kim schreef:
> From: YoungJun Cho
>
> The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex,
> but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to missing
> callers and adds WARN_ON assertion whether drm_gem_mmap_obj() is
> called with mutex lock or
From: YoungJun Cho
The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex,
but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to missing
callers and adds WARN_ON assertion whether drm_gem_mmap_obj() is
called with mutex lock or not.
Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho
Signed-off-by: Seu