Thanks for all the acks, added them all and applied the patch.
-Daniel
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 02:14:03AM +0100, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Acked-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 8:47 PM Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >
> > Acked-by: Jason Ekstrand
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 4:22
Acked-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 8:47 PM Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> Acked-by: Jason Ekstrand
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 4:22 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 11:07, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 08:24:37PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote
Acked-by: Jason Ekstrand
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 4:22 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 11:07, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 08:24:37PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > It's a bit a FAQ, and we really can't claim to be the authoritative
> > > source for all
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 11:07, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 08:24:37PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > It's a bit a FAQ, and we really can't claim to be the authoritative
> > source for allocating these numbers used in many standard extensions
> > if we tell closed source or vend
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 08:24:37PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> It's a bit a FAQ, and we really can't claim to be the authoritative
> source for allocating these numbers used in many standard extensions
> if we tell closed source or vendor stacks in general to go away.
>
> Iirc this was already c
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 19:24, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> It's a bit a FAQ, and we really can't claim to be the authoritative
> source for allocating these numbers used in many standard extensions
> if we tell closed source or vendor stacks in general to go away.
>
> Iirc this was already clarified in
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 08:24:37PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> It's a bit a FAQ, and we really can't claim to be the authoritative
> source for allocating these numbers used in many standard extensions
> if we tell closed source or vendor stacks in general to go away.
>
> Iirc this was already c
It's a bit a FAQ, and we really can't claim to be the authoritative
source for allocating these numbers used in many standard extensions
if we tell closed source or vendor stacks in general to go away.
Iirc this was already clarified in some vulkan discussions, but I
can't find that anywhere anymo
