Hello,
On 5/25/21 3:34 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> If you guys with your distro hats on all think it doesn't matter, then
>> yeah I'm all for dropping the somewhat silly -drm or drmfb suffixes. I
>> think that was just way back so it's easier to know you've loaded the
>> right driv
Hi
Am 25.05.21 um 15:08 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 08:53:56PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 21.05.21 um 19:18 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
On 5/21/21 6:53 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
[snip]
So what with all the drivers which do _not_ have drm in their nam
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 08:53:56PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 21.05.21 um 19:18 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
> > On 5/21/21 6:53 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > >
> > > > So what with all the drivers which do _not_ have drm in their name? Also
> > > >
Hi
Am 21.05.21 um 19:18 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
On 5/21/21 6:53 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
[snip]
So what with all the drivers which do _not_ have drm in their name? Also
I'm never sure how much these are uapi or not ...
That someone could threat as an uapi is a fair point in
On 5/21/21 6:53 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> So what with all the drivers which do _not_ have drm in their name? Also
>> I'm never sure how much these are uapi or not ...
>
That someone could threat as an uapi is a fair point indeed.
> Why do we need a suffix anyway?
>
Yes, I th
Hi
Am 21.05.21 um 17:33 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 03:19:10PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Framebuffer devices that are registered by DRM drivers for fbdev emulation
have a "drmfb" suffix in their name. But makes them to be quite confusing
if a driver already has "
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 03:19:10PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Framebuffer devices that are registered by DRM drivers for fbdev emulation
> have a "drmfb" suffix in their name. But makes them to be quite confusing
> if a driver already has "drm" in its name:
>
> $ cat /proc/fb
> 0 roc
Framebuffer devices that are registered by DRM drivers for fbdev emulation
have a "drmfb" suffix in their name. But makes them to be quite confusing
if a driver already has "drm" in its name:
$ cat /proc/fb
0 rockchipdrmdrmfb
$ cat /proc/fb
0 simpledrmdrmfb
Instead, let's just add a "-fb" suffix
