2015ë
10ì 13ì¼ 14:23ì Joonyoung Shim ì´(ê°) ì´ ê¸:
> On 10/13/2015 02:11 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>> Merged.
>>
>
> Thanks for merge but this will be conflicted with the patch of Daniel,
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/60565/
Right. With Daniel patch, DRM_UNLOCKED flag isn't need
On 10/13/2015 02:23 PM, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> On 10/13/2015 02:11 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>> Merged.
>>
>
> Thanks for merge but this will be conflicted with the patch of Daniel,
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/60565/
>
Oops, wrong link,
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx
On 10/13/2015 02:11 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>
> Merged.
>
Thanks for merge but this will be conflicted with the patch of Daniel,
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/60565/
I found it on next-20151012, do you want v2 patch that DRM_UNLOCKED flag
is dropped?
Thanks.
> Thanks,
> Inki Dae
>
> 201
Merged.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
2015ë
10ì 05ì¼ 12:04ì Joonyoung Shim ì´(ê°) ì´ ê¸:
> The commit d931589c01a2 ("drm/exynos: remove DRM_EXYNOS_GEM_MAP_OFFSET
> ioctl") removed it same with the ioctl that this patch adds. The reason
> that removed DRM_EXYNOS_GEM_MAP_OFFSET was we could use
> DR
The commit d931589c01a2 ("drm/exynos: remove DRM_EXYNOS_GEM_MAP_OFFSET
ioctl") removed it same with the ioctl that this patch adds. The reason
that removed DRM_EXYNOS_GEM_MAP_OFFSET was we could use
DRM_IOCTL_MODE_MAP_DUMB. Both did exactly same thing.
Now we again will revive it as DRM_EXYNOS_GEM
