Hi,
On 1/19/24 16:32, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 10:05:57AM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
The relatively recently introduced drm/exec utility was using uint32_t
in its interface, which was then also carried over to drm/gpuvm.
Prefe
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 10:05:57AM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>>The relatively recently introduced drm/exec utility was using uint32_t
>>in its interface, which was then also carried over to drm/gpuvm.
>>
>>Prefer u32 in new code and update drm/exe
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 10:05:57AM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
The relatively recently introduced drm/exec utility was using uint32_t
in its interface, which was then also carried over to drm/gpuvm.
Prefer u32 in new code and update drm/exec and drm/gpuvm accordingly.
Cc: Christian König
Cc
On 1/19/24 10:05, Thomas Hellström wrote:
The relatively recently introduced drm/exec utility was using uint32_t
in its interface, which was then also carried over to drm/gpuvm.
Prefer u32 in new code and update drm/exec and drm/gpuvm accordingly.
Cc: Christian König
Cc: Danilo Krummrich
Sign
Am 19.01.24 um 10:05 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
The relatively recently introduced drm/exec utility was using uint32_t
in its interface, which was then also carried over to drm/gpuvm.
Prefer u32 in new code and update drm/exec and drm/gpuvm accordingly.
Cc: Christian König
Cc: Danilo Krummrich
The relatively recently introduced drm/exec utility was using uint32_t
in its interface, which was then also carried over to drm/gpuvm.
Prefer u32 in new code and update drm/exec and drm/gpuvm accordingly.
Cc: Christian König
Cc: Danilo Krummrich
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström
---
drivers/gp
