On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:49:10PM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 09:19:30AM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > > Working with HDMI TVs is a real pain as they tend to overscan by
> > > default, meaning that the p
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 09:19:30AM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Working with HDMI TVs is a real pain as they tend to overscan by
> default, meaning that the pixels around the edge of the framebuffer
> are not displayed. This is well explained here:
> http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/8705.html
>
> There
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 09:19:30AM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > Working with HDMI TVs is a real pain as they tend to overscan by
> > default, meaning that the pixels around the edge of the framebuffer
> > are not displayed. This is
Working with HDMI TVs is a real pain as they tend to overscan by
default, meaning that the pixels around the edge of the framebuffer
are not displayed. This is well explained here:
http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/8705.html
There is a bit in the HDMI info frame that can request that the
remote display