[PATCH] drm/doc: Document legacy_cursor_update better

2020-10-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
It's the horror and shouldn't be used. Realized we're not clear on this in a discussion with Rob about what msm is doing to better support async commits. v2: Refine existing todo item to include this (Thomas) Cc: Sean Paul Cc: Rob Clark Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Cc: Maarten Lankhorst Cc: M

Re: [PATCH] drm/doc: Document legacy_cursor_update better

2020-10-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 4:55 PM Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi > > On 20.10.20 16:39, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > It's the horror and shouldn't be used. Realized we're not clear on > > this in a discussion with Rob about what msm is doing to better > > support async commits. > > > > Cc: Rob Clark >

Re: [PATCH] drm/doc: Document legacy_cursor_update better

2020-10-20 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi On 20.10.20 16:39, Daniel Vetter wrote: > It's the horror and shouldn't be used. Realized we're not clear on > this in a discussion with Rob about what msm is doing to better > support async commits. > > Cc: Rob Clark > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst > Cc: Maxime Ripar

Re: [PATCH] drm/doc: Document legacy_cursor_update better

2020-10-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
Also cc Sean, who reviewed the msm patch to double down on the not-so-awesome async solution (I think at least, I'm still not entirely sure what's all going on there): commit 2d99ced787e3d0f251fa370d2aae83cf2085a8d9 Author: Rob Clark Date: Thu Aug 29 09:45:16 2019 -0700 drm/msm: async commi

[PATCH] drm/doc: Document legacy_cursor_update better

2020-10-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
It's the horror and shouldn't be used. Realized we're not clear on this in a discussion with Rob about what msm is doing to better support async commits. Cc: Rob Clark Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Cc: Maarten Lankhorst Cc: Maxime Ripard Cc: Thomas Zimmermann Cc: David Airlie Cc: Daniel Vette