Sure Pierre
Go ahead and get them merged. I am also planning to use that information
in debugfs implementation of some parameters of our driver so I do need
those. I will drop my debugfs patch.
Regards
Sunil Khatri
On 5/28/2025 6:32 PM, Christian König wrote:
On 5/28/25 14:33, Pierre-Eric P
-
From: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2025 6:03 PM
To: Koenig, Christian ; Khatri, Sunil
; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Tvrtko Ursulin
; dmitry.osipe...@collabora.com; Pelloux-Prayer,
Pierre-Eric
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/debugfs: add client-id to the debugfs entry
Hi
On 5/28/25 14:33, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch looks similar to:
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2025-May/507653.html
Mhm, I thought that I have seen that before.
Why haven't we pushed that yet? Is there still some ongoing reviews on the
scheduler si
Hi,
This patch looks similar to:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2025-May/507653.html
Thanks,
Pierre-Eric
Le 28/05/2025 à 13:00, Christian König a écrit :
Adding some people who worked on the client name and client id fields.
On 5/28/25 09:22, Sunil Khatri wrote:
pid is not
Adding some people who worked on the client name and client id fields.
On 5/28/25 09:22, Sunil Khatri wrote:
> pid is not always the right choice for fd to track
> the caller and hence adding drm client-id to the
> print which is unique for a drm client and can be
> used by driver in debugging
>
pid is not always the right choice for fd to track
the caller and hence adding drm client-id to the
print which is unique for a drm client and can be
used by driver in debugging
One of the use is to further enhance debugging for
amdgpu driver based on client-id.
Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri
---
