Hi,
Sorry for the late response, been very busy with other stuff lately.
I've tested this version against drm-fixes and it indeed fixes the
problem, as far as I can tell.
Tested-by: Thomas Hellstrom
On 03/31/2016 01:26 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> It turns out that preserving framebuffers a
It turns out that preserving framebuffers after the rmfb call breaks
vmwgfx userspace. This was originally introduced because it was thought
nobody relied on the behavior, but unfortunately it seems there are
exceptions.
drm_framebuffer_remove may fail with -EINTR now, so a straight revert
is impo
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 01:26:03PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> It turns out that preserving framebuffers after the rmfb call breaks
> vmwgfx userspace. This was originally introduced because it was thought
> nobody relied on the behavior, but unfortunately it seems there are
> exceptions.
>
Op 31-03-16 om 13:26 schreef Maarten Lankhorst:
> It turns out that preserving framebuffers after the rmfb call breaks
> vmwgfx userspace. This was originally introduced because it was thought
> nobody relied on the behavior, but unfortunately it seems there are
> exceptions.
>
> drm_framebuffer_re
It turns out that preserving framebuffers after the rmfb call breaks
vmwgfx userspace. This was originally introduced because it was thought
nobody relied on the behavior, but unfortunately it seems there are
exceptions.
drm_framebuffer_remove may fail with -EINTR now, so a straight revert
is impo
