On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 03:31:06PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 04:13:42PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 01:50:19PM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 03:27:09PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > >On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:4
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 04:13:42PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 01:50:19PM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 03:27:09PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > >On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:47:48AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > >> Explicitly state the expected
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 01:50:19PM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 03:27:09PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:47:48AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> >> Explicitly state the expected CTM equations in the kerneldoc for the CTM
> >> property.
> >>
> >> Cc
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 03:27:09PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:47:48AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
Explicitly state the expected CTM equations in the kerneldoc for the CTM
property.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Signed-off-by: Brian Star
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:47:48AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> Explicitly state the expected CTM equations in the kerneldoc for the CTM
> property.
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä
> Cc: Lionel Landwerlin
> Cc: Daniel Vetter
> Signed-off-by: Brian Starkey
> ---
>
> Hi,
>
> This captures the outcome o
Explicitly state the expected CTM equations in the kerneldoc for the CTM
property.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Signed-off-by: Brian Starkey
---
Hi,
This captures the outcome of the discussion on #dri-devel yesterday
(2017-01-26):
https://people.freedesktop.org/~