; ; Jernej Skrabec ; David Airlie
> ; Daniel Vetter
> Cc: Qilin Wen ; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; dri-
> de...@lists.freedesktop.org; hsi...@chromium.org; Bernie Liang
> ; Xin Ji
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: Add 200ms delay to wait FW HPD status stable
>
> On Th
s Karlman ; Jernej Skrabec ;
> David Airlie ; Daniel Vetter ; Qilin Wen
> ; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; dri-
> de...@lists.freedesktop.org; hsi...@chromium.org; Bernie Liang
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: Add 200ms delay to wait FW HPD status stable
>
> CAU
The subject line is missing the driver name.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 03:09:10PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2023, Xin Ji wrote:
> > For the none-interrupt design(sink device is panel, polling HPD
s/none-interrupt/no-interrupt/ ?
s/design/design /
> > status when chip power on),
On Thu, 21 Sep 2023, Xin Ji wrote:
> For the none-interrupt design(sink device is panel, polling HPD
> status when chip power on), anx7625 FW has more than 200ms HPD
> de-bounce time in FW, for the safety to get HPD status, driver
> better to wait 200ms before HPD detection after OS resume back.
>
For the none-interrupt design(sink device is panel, polling HPD
status when chip power on), anx7625 FW has more than 200ms HPD
de-bounce time in FW, for the safety to get HPD status, driver
better to wait 200ms before HPD detection after OS resume back.
Signed-off-by: Xin Ji
---
drivers/gpu/drm/
