On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 01:14:37PM +0100, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
> On 1/27/20 11:02 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > vmwgfx stopped using them.
> >
> > With the drm device model that we've slowly evolved over the past few
> > years master status essentially controls access to display resourc
On 1/27/20 11:02 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
vmwgfx stopped using them.
With the drm device model that we've slowly evolved over the past few
years master status essentially controls access to display resources,
and nothing else. Since that's a pure access permission check drivers
should have no ne
Am 27.01.20 um 11:02 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> vmwgfx stopped using them.
>
> With the drm device model that we've slowly evolved over the past few
> years master status essentially controls access to display resources,
> and nothing else. Since that's a pure access permission check drivers
> sho
vmwgfx stopped using them.
With the drm device model that we've slowly evolved over the past few
years master status essentially controls access to display resources,
and nothing else. Since that's a pure access permission check drivers
should have no need at all to track additional state on a per
