On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:03:44AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The drm_ati_pcigart_init() function was originally suppose to return one
> on success and zero on failure, but these days it returns a mix of
> zero, one and -ENOMEM on failure.
>
> This patch cleans it up and modifies the caller so
The drm_ati_pcigart_init() function was originally suppose to return one
on success and zero on failure, but these days it returns a mix of
zero, one and -ENOMEM on failure.
This patch cleans it up and modifies the caller so now the function
returns zero on success and negative error codes on fail
