Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 10:15 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 03:17:55PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > drm_encoder_slave is the old way to write bridge drivers, for i2c
> > bridges only. It's deprecated, and definitely should not be used in
> > new drivers. This ha
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 18:07 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Alexey Brodkin
> wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 10:15 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 03:17:55PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > drm_encoder_sl
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Alexey Brodkin
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 10:15 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 03:17:55PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > drm_encoder_slave is the old way to write bridge drivers, for i2c
>> > bridges only. It's deprecate
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 03:17:55PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> drm_encoder_slave is the old way to write bridge drivers, for i2c
> bridges only. It's deprecated, and definitely should not be used in
> new drivers. This has absolutely nothing to do with the new bridge
> driver infrastructure imple
Hi Daniel,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on drm/drm-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.15-rc8 next-20180119]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
Hi Daniel,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.15-rc8 next-20180119]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 14:43 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> drm_encoder_slave is the old way to write bridge drivers, for i2c
> bridges only. It's deprecated, and definitely should not be used in
> new drivers.
>
> What's even strange is that arcpgu doesn't even use any of this, it
> rea
drm_encoder_slave is the old way to write bridge drivers, for i2c
bridges only. It's deprecated, and definitely should not be used in
new drivers. This has absolutely nothing to do with the new bridge
driver infrastructure implemented by drm_bridge.
What's even strange is that arcpgu doesn't even
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 01:55:55PM +, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 14:43 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > drm_encoder_slave is the old way to write bridge drivers, for i2c
> > bridges only. It's deprecated, and definitely should not be used in
> > new drivers.
>
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wednesday, 17 January 2018 15:53:07 EET Daniel Vetter wrote:
> drm_encoder_slave is the old way to write bridge drivers, for i2c
> bridges only. It's deprecated, and definitely should not be used in
> new drivers.
>
> What's even strange is that arcpgu does
drm_encoder_slave is the old way to write bridge drivers, for i2c
bridges only. It's deprecated, and definitely should not be used in
new drivers.
What's even strange is that arcpgu doesn't even use any of this, it
really only wants a plain normal drm_encoder. Nuke all the surplus
real estate.
v2
drm_encoder_slave is the old way to write bridge drivers, for i2c
bridges only. It's deprecated, and definitely should not be used in
new drivers.
What's even strange is that arcpgu doesn't even use any of this, it
really only wants a plain normal drm_encoder. Nuke all the surplus
real estate.
Cc
12 matches
Mail list logo