On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 12:49 PM Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 2:32 PM Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> >
> > On 2024-06-16 11:12:03+, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > Instead of manually passing around 'struct edid *' and its size,
> > > use 'struct drm_edid', which encapsulates a va
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 2:32 PM Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>
> On 2024-06-16 11:12:03+, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Instead of manually passing around 'struct edid *' and its size,
> > use 'struct drm_edid', which encapsulates a validated combination of
> > both.
> >
> > As the drm_edid_ can hand
Hi amdgpu maintainers,
did you get a chance to look at the patch and the suspected bug?
Thanks,
Thomas
On 2024-06-16 20:14:45+, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2024-06-16 11:12:03+, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Instead of manually passing around 'struct edid *' and its size,
> > use 'struct
On 2024-06-16 11:12:03+, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Instead of manually passing around 'struct edid *' and its size,
> use 'struct drm_edid', which encapsulates a validated combination of
> both.
>
> As the drm_edid_ can handle NULL gracefully, the explicit checks can be
> dropped.
>
> Also sa
Instead of manually passing around 'struct edid *' and its size,
use 'struct drm_edid', which encapsulates a validated combination of
both.
As the drm_edid_ can handle NULL gracefully, the explicit checks can be
dropped.
Also save a few characters by transforming '&array[0]' to the equivalent
'ar
