On 2018-02-02 11:02 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:39 PM, Harry Wentland wrote:
>> On 2018-02-02 07:31 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> Building the amd display driver with link-time optimizations revealed a bug
>>
>> Curious how I'd go about building with link-time optimizations.
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:39 PM, Harry Wentland wrote:
> On 2018-02-02 07:31 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Building the amd display driver with link-time optimizations revealed a bug
>
> Curious how I'd go about building with link-time optimizations.
I got the idea from last week's LWN article on th
On 2018-02-02 07:31 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Building the amd display driver with link-time optimizations revealed a bug
Curious how I'd go about building with link-time optimizations.
> that caused dal_cmd_tbl_helper_dce80_get_table() and
> dal_cmd_tbl_helper_dce110_get_table() get called with
Building the amd display driver with link-time optimizations revealed a bug
that caused dal_cmd_tbl_helper_dce80_get_table() and
dal_cmd_tbl_helper_dce110_get_table() get called with an incompatible
return type between the two callers in command_table_helper.c and
command_table_helper2.c:
drivers/
